Twelve numbers, each a description of a tendency rather than a measurement. Every page states how often the number actually occurs across calendar dates, which contradicts the thing this category repeats most often.
Prepared by NUMERA
One line each; the pages go further.
Counting every date from 1940 to 2010, the six ordinary numbers — 1, 3, 5, 7, 8 and 9 — take about 11.1% each. The numbers that come out rare are 2, 4 and 6, because the convention keeps totals of 11, 22 and 33 unreduced instead of collapsing them. Life path 2 lands on 1.60% of dates while 11 lands on 9.51%: the master number is roughly six times more common than the number it replaces.
These figures count calendar dates, not people or actual birth records. They use the full-date digit-sum method, preserving 11, 22 and 33, across the stated years. A different method or year range can produce different shares.
The single digits 1 to 9, plus the master numbers 11, 22 and 33, which the tradition keeps unreduced. A date of birth reduces to exactly one of them.
Over 1940–2010 it is life path 2, at about 1.60% of dates — rarer than every master number. That is the opposite of what most numerology sites claim, and it follows directly from keeping 11 unreduced.